Difference between court and tribunal

Difference between Court and Tribunal

TANMOY MUKHERJI INSTITUTE OF JURIDICAL SCIENCE

Dr. Tanmoy Mukherji

Advocate

Difference between Court and Tribunal-

Tanmoy Mukherji

Advocate


Basis

 

Court

 

Tribunal

 

Meaning

 

A Court is a judicial body established under the Constitution to administer justice in civil, criminal, constitutional matters.

A tribunal is a quasi-judicial body created by statute to deal with specific types of disputes (like tax, administrative, service matters).

 

Scope of Power

 

Established under the Constitution of India (e.g., Supreme Court, High Court).

 

Created by Acts of Parliament or State Legislature.

 

Nature

 

Purely Judicial Body.

 

Quasi-Judicial Body (Combines Administrative & Judicial functions).

 

Union of India v. R. GandhiTribunal must have characteristics similar to court, when relating them.

Basis

 

Court

 

Tribunal

 

Procedure

 

Follows Strict Procedure like:

CPC

BNSS

BSA

 

Not Strictly bound by CPC or Sakshya Adhiniyam, follows principles of Natural Justice.

 

State of Mysore vs Shivabasappa Tribunals are not bound by technical rules of evidence.

 

Basis

 

Court

 

Tribunal

 

Judges/Members

 

Judges are legally trained and qualified (Judicial officers)

 

Members may include Judicial members, Technical Experts, Administrative Experts.

R. K. Jain v/s Union of India Highlighted need for qualified members in tribunals.

 

Basis

 

Court

 

Tribunal

 

Scope of Jurisdiction

 

Has wide jurisdiction (civil, criminal, constitutional).

 

Has limited and specific jurisdiction (e.g., tax, service, company law).

 

Flexibility

 

Less flexible, bound by formalities.

 

More flexible, less formal.

 

Appeal

 

Appeals lie in Higher Courts.

 

Appeals may lie to appellate tribunals, or directly to High Court/Supreme Court.

 

Example

 

Supreme Court, High Court, District Court

 

National Green Tribunal (NGT), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT)

 

Independence

 

Enjoys complete Independence

 

Independence is comparatively weaker

 

Madras Bar Association v/s Union of IndiaEmphasized need for independence of tribunals similar to courts

 

 

Power of Judicial Review

 

Can exercise judicial review under Articles 32 & 226.

 

Cannot exercise full Judicial Review like Constitutional Courts.

Chandra Kumar v/s Union of India Judicial Review is part of the basic structure. Tribunals are subject to High Court review.

Binding Nature of Precedent

 

Bound by doctrine of Precedent (Stare Decisis)

 

Not strictly bound, but generally follows higher courts decisions.

East India Commercial Co. Ltd. V/s Collection of Customs Lower authorities (including tribunals) must follow higher Court decisions.

 

Objective

 

General Justice Delivery

 

Specialized Justice + Speedy disposal in technical matters.

 

S.P. Sampath Kumar v/s Union of India Tribunals are created to reduce the burden of courts.

Contempt Powers

 

Has inherent power to punish for Contempt.

 

limited or statutory contempt powers.

T. Sudhakar Prasad v/s Govt. of A.P. Tribunals can exercise contempt powers if provided by Statute.